Hello, in my delirium experimentalist thinking to reinvent the wheel came to my mind a few things to me, personally, would love to look into.
Reda's book, the lesson of Dodet and my new curiosity about the personal meaning of organizations have tickled my experimental side, and asked myself: given such a beautiful theory that looks very solid from the clinical point of view, because, if there are already around, there is no test on these constructs?
So I puzzled a little (big trouble if two neurons are crashing randomly) and I gave birth to this idea: why do not we build one? Why do not we test so as to test the theory (which I think is very solid)? If there is a Rorschach Test because there should be a cognitive organization of personal meaning?
Then, always in my delirium, I thought phrases that attempt to identify the emotional modulation characteristics of the different organizations to which subjects respond on the model of Likert scales (1-7, assolutamente mi descrive/non mi descrive per nulla).
Tutto ciò, ritengo, andrebbe testato tanto su persone NON in terapia, quanto su persone in terapia, e poi, almeno nel secondo caso, il risultato dovrebbe essere confrontato col giudizio dato dal terapeuta.
Io penso, ma capisco che sia una idea dettata dalla mia ignoranza profonda, perciò invito tutti a correggermi, che, nonostante il fatto che il nostro stile nell'interfacciarci con il mondo esterno ed interno sia unico per ognuno di noi, esistano aree (diverse per ciascuno) nelle quali il nostro modo di conoscenza sia "dappico", "fobico", "depressivo" o "ossessivo". Cioè la nostra modulazione emotiva sia "area-specifica" a seconda del significato che we have given to that aspect, that part of the world. Perhaps this is the basis of mixed organizations? I do not know, but my curiosity is all that I want to share with you, also to get tips, ideas, criticisms and corrections, to enable, in short, a discussion on this topic.
the next lesson!
0 comments:
Post a Comment